| Revista: | Educación química |
| Base de datos: | PERIÓDICA |
| Número de sistema: | 000329745 |
| ISSN: | 0187-893X |
| Autores: | Andrade Gamboa, Julio J1 Donati, Edgardo D2 |
| Instituciones: | 1Centro Atómico Bariloche, Bariloche, Río Negro. Argentina 2Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, La Plata, Buenos Aires. Argentina |
| Año: | 2010 |
| Periodo: | Oct |
| Volumen: | 21 |
| Número: | 4 |
| Paginación: | 274-277 |
| País: | México |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Tipo de documento: | Nota breve o noticia |
| Enfoque: | Analítico, descriptivo |
| Resumen en inglés | In most basic chemistry courses a kinetic approach is used to explain the vapor pressure lowering for solutions with a non volatile solute. This approach has been considered intrinsically incorrect for many years based on several objections. We consider that these objections are based on a misinterpretation of the kinetic model. In this paper we will show in detail this model to refute those objections and show that the kinetic approach can be a suitable teaching tool for explaining vapor pressure lowering in ideal solutions of non volatile solutes |
| Disciplinas: | Química, Educación |
| Palabras clave: | Fisicoquímica y química teórica, Didáctica, Cinética química, Soluciones ideales, Presión de vapor, Enseñanza de la química |
| Keyword: | Chemistry, Education, Physical and theoretical chemistry, Didactics, Chemical kinetics, Ideal solutions, Vapor pressure, Chemistry teaching |
| Texto completo: | Texto completo (Ver PDF) |
