| Journal: | Revista especializada en investigación jurídica |
| Database: | CLASE |
| System number: | 000511526 |
| ISSN: | 2448-8739 |
| Authors: | Fonseca Luján, Roberto Carlos1 |
| Institutions: | 1Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México. México |
| Year: | 2021 |
| Season: | Jul-Dic |
| Number: | 9 |
| Pages: | 27-48 |
| Country: | México |
| Language: | Español |
| Document type: | Artículo |
| Approach: | Analítico, descriptivo |
| Spanish abstract | El artículo tiene como objetivo central proponer un concepto constitucional de delito construido con base en los principios constitucionales de taxatividad, proporcionalidad y dignidad de la persona. Este concepto es pertinente en el marco del diálogo entre la dogmática penal y constitucional que ocurre en el proceso actual de constitucionalización del ordenamiento. La metodología emplea el método sistemático, cuya aplicación permite relacionar los principios desarrollados por la interpretación constitucional de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación con las categorías penales generadas por la Teoría del Delito |
| English abstract | The general purpose of the article is to propose a constitutional concept of crime based on the constitutio-nal principles of non-vagueness, proportionality and person’s dignity. This concept is pertinent within the framework of the dialogue between criminal law and constitutional law. This dialogue occurs in the current process of constitutionalization of the system. The methodology uses the systematic method to relate the principles developed by the constitutional interpretation of the Mexican Supreme Court with the categories developed by the Theory of Crime. The use of systematic method leads to identify that the three categories of analysis of the Theory of Crime (criminal definition, unlawfulness and culpability) have as constitutional correlates the principles of non-vagueness, propor-tionality and dignity, with which they form inseparable pairs. This study is original because an explicit exposition of these couples is not found in the national criminal doctrine. The conclusion propo-ses that a crime from the constitutional perspective is any conduct that has three qualities: it is unlawful because it attacks a constitu-tionally protected value, so its punishment respects proportionali-ty; it is illegal because it fits into a specifically defined crime; and it is guilty-minded because it is freely executed by a person to whom dignity is recognized |
| Disciplines: | Derecho |
| Keyword: | Derecho público, Historia y teorías del derecho, Teoría del delito, Delito, Tipicidad, Proporcionalidad, Culpabilidad, Pensamiento jurídico |
| Full text: | http://erevistas.uacj.mx/ojs/index.php/reij/article/view/4375/3355 |
