Plato versus Protagoras: The "Statesman", the "Theaetetus", and the "Sophist"



Document title: Plato versus Protagoras: The "Statesman", the "Theaetetus", and the "Sophist"
Journal: Diálogos (Río Piedras)
Database: CLASE
System number: 000466328
ISSN: 0012-2122
Authors: 1
Institutions: 1Durham University, Durham. Reino Unido
Year:
Season: Dic
Volumen: 47
Number: 98
Pages: 143-166
Country: Puerto Rico
Language: Inglés
Document type: Artículo
Approach: Analítico
English abstract The Statesman is nowadays generally read either on its own, or with Republic and Laws. But more attention needs to be given to the fact that it is designed as part of a trilogy, alongside Theaetetus and Sophist. Reinstating the dialogue in this context gives a fuller perspective on its purposes. The Statesman (1) identifies existing so- called «statesmen», for whom the Protagoras of Theaetetus is chief apologist, as the greatest exemplars of sophistry as defined in Sophist: mere «imitators» and dealers in falsehood; (2) offers the Platonic alternative to the Protagorean vision of human life and organization sketched in the first part of Theaetetus; and (3), in common with Sophist, illustrates –after the apparent failures of Theaetetus– both what knowledge is and how it can be acquired. Finally, and controversially, the Statesman emerges, along with Theaetetus and Sophist, as part of one and the same project as the Republic
Disciplines: Filosofía
Keyword: Doctrinas y corrientes filosóficas,
Platón,
Protágoras,
Filosofía política,
Gobierno
Full text: Texto completo (Ver HTML)