| Journal: | Brazilian journal of physics |
| Database: | PERIÓDICA |
| System number: | 000379552 |
| ISSN: | 0103-9733 |
| Authors: | Israel, Martin H1 |
| Institutions: | 1Washington University in St. Louis, McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, Saint Louis, Misuri. Estados Unidos de América |
| Year: | 2014 |
| Season: | Oct |
| Volumen: | 44 |
| Number: | 5 |
| Pages: | 530-533 |
| Country: | Brasil |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Document type: | Conferencia o discurso |
| Approach: | Analítico, descriptivo |
| English abstract | Space-based observations by PAMELA (Adriani et al., Nature 458, 607, 2009), Fermi-LAT (Ackerman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 01103, 2012), and AMS (Aguilar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 141102, 2013) have demonstrated that the positron fraction (e+/total-e) increases with increasing energy above about 10 GeV. According to the propagation model for Galactic cosmic rays in widespread use (Moskalenko & Strong, Astrophys. J. 493, 693, 1998), the production of secondary positrons from interaction of cosmic-ray protons and heavier nuclei with the interstellar medium gives a generally falling positron fraction between 10 and 100 GeV, with secondary positrons accounting for only ∼20 % of the observed positron fraction at 100 GeV; so some other physical phenomena have been proposed to explain the data. An alternative approach to interpreting the positron observations is to consider these data as presenting an opportunity for re-examining models of Galactic cosmicray propagation. Following release of the PAMELA data, three groups published propagation models (Shaviv, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 111302, 2009, Cowsik and Burch, Phys. Rev. D. 82, 023009, 2010, Katz et al., Mon. Not. R. Aston. Soc. 405, 1458 2010) in which the observed positron fraction is explained entirely by secondary positrons produced in the interstellar medium. In May of this year, stimulated by the AMS extension of the positron data to higher energy with excellent statistics, two of those groups presented further development of their calculations (Cowsik et al. 2013, Blum et al. 2013), again concluding that the observed positrons can be understood as secondaries. None of the authors of these five papers was registered for the 33rd International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC). Although I am not an author of any of these papers, I have some close familiarity with one of these recent papers, so the conference organizers invited me to bring this alternative |
| Disciplines: | Física y astronomía |
| Keyword: | Astronomía, Física de partículas y campos cuánticos, Rayos cósmicos, Positrones, Propagación |
| Keyword: | Physics and astronomy, Astronomy, Particle physics and quantum fields, Cosmic rays, Positrons, Propagation |
| Full text: | Texto completo (Ver PDF) |
