| Journal: | Acta de investigación psicológica |
| Database: | CLASE |
| System number: | 000455865 |
| ISSN: | 2007-4832 |
| Authors: | Avila, Raúl1 Toledo, Aldo C1 |
| Institutions: | 1Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Psicología, Ciudad de México. México |
| Year: | 2016 |
| Season: | Ago |
| Volumen: | 6 |
| Number: | 2 |
| Pages: | 2477-2484 |
| Country: | México |
| Language: | Español |
| Document type: | Artículo |
| Approach: | Analítico, teórico |
| Spanish abstract | Los descuentos temporal, probabilístico y social se refieren a la disminución del valor de una recompensa en función de su demora de entrega, probabilidad o distancia social, respectivamente. Una pregunta en el área es si los 3 tipos de descuento comparten un mismo proceso. Por otra parte, se ha sugerido que el método empleado modula las tasas de descuento. Por lo tanto, el propósito del presente estudio fue averiguar si el método empleado contribuye a la correlación entre los 3 tipos de descuento. Cuarenta y cuatro participantes respondieron tareas de descuento temporal, probabilístico y social con 2 métodos diferentes, elección binaria y ajuste de la magnitud. Se encontró que, con el método elección binaria, el descuento social correlacionó con los descuentos temporal y probabilístico, pero los últimos 2 no correlacionaron entre sí. Con el método ajuste de la magnitud, solo se encontró una correlación entre los descuentos temporal y probabilístico. Estos resultados sugieren que el método empleado contribuye a la búsqueda de un proceso común entre los 3 tipos de descuento. Incluso, un proceso común de toma decisiones subyacente a los 3 tipos de descuento podría depender del contexto en que se toma la decisión |
| English abstract | Delay, probability and social discounting referto the decrease in the subjective value of a reward as a function ofits delay of delivery, probability orsocial distance,respectively. One question in the area is whetherthe three types of discounting share the same process or whetherthey are held by different processes. This question has been investigated by looking at the correlations between the three types of discounting. Moreover, it has been suggested that the method used to obtain the indifference points could modulate the discounting rates. However, the search of a common process underlying the three types of discounting should not be influenced by the method used to obtain the indifference points. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether the method used to obtain the indifference points contributes to the correlation between the three types of discounting. Forty-four college students responded tasks of delay, probability and social discounting —which used a hypothetical monetary reward— with two different methods: Binary choice and adjusting amount. We found significant correlations between binary-choice and adjusting-amount methods for the three types of discounting. Albeit, a significantly higher delay discounting rate was found with the adjusting-amount method rather than with the binary-choice method, but there were no significant differences between the probability and social discounting rates obtained with both methods. In addition to the previous results, with the binary-choice method it was found that social discounting correlated with delay and probability discounting, but the last two did not correlate between them. In contrast, with the adjusting-amount method, it was only found a correlation between delay and probability discounting |
| Disciplines: | Psicología |
| Keyword: | Psicometría, Descuentos temporales, Elección, Metodología, Psicología experimental, Comportamiento |
| Full text: | Texto completo (Ver PDF) |
