| Revue: | Revista especializada en investigación jurídica |
| Base de datos: | CLASE |
| Número de sistema: | 000511525 |
| ISSN: | 2448-8739 |
| Autores: | García Villegas, Jaime Ernesto1 Maguregui Alcaráz, Lila1 |
| Instituciones: | 1Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua. México |
| Año: | 2021 |
| Periodo: | Jul-Dic |
| Número: | 9 |
| Paginación: | 8-26 |
| País: | México |
| Idioma: | Español |
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Enfoque: | Analítico, descriptivo |
| Resumen en español | El Código Nacional de Procedimientos Penales determina, en el artículo 211, que el ejercicio de la acción penal se inicia desde que el Ministerio Público solicita un citatorio para la programación de la audiencia inicial. Técnicamente se debería suspender la prescripción de la acción penal, toda vez que, a partir de ese momento, se debe considerar que existe una facultad ejercida por el órgano persecutor |
| Resumen en inglés | The National Code of Criminal Procedures determines in article 211 that the exercise of the criminal action begins from the moment the public prosecutor requests a summons for the scheduling of the initial hearing, which technically should suspend the prescrip-tion of the criminal action, every time that, from that moment on, it must be considered that there is a power exercised by the prose-cuting body. This criterion is different from the determination that was contained in the Code of Criminal Procedures of the State of Chihuahua, which established that the prescription was interrup-ted until the moment in which the imputation was made, and not previous moments, such as the request for programming and sum-mons. Therefore, since the Code of Criminal Procedures of the State of Chihuahua has lost its validity, the State Criminal Code must ad-just the provisions that refer to the statute of limitations, and that relate to the exercise of criminal action, to the criterion previously specified, by virtue of the fact that the substantive part continues to specify that the prescription of the criminal action is interrupted until the appearance of the accused before the control judge (for-mulation of the accusation), which can generate interpretive pro-blems and cause nugatory the human right of access to justice for victims or offended |
| Disciplinas: | Derecho |
| Palabras clave: | Derecho público, Derecho penal, Derecho procesal, México, Sistema jurídico, Acción penal, Prescripción, Principio de especialidad, Impartición de justicia, Código Nacional de Procedimientos Penales |
| Texte intégral: | http://erevistas.uacj.mx/ojs/index.php/reij/article/view/4373/3354 |
