| Revue: | Ludus vitalis |
| Base de datos: | CLASE |
| Número de sistema: | 000406076 |
| ISSN: | 1133-5165 |
| Autores: | Ayestarán, Ignacio1 |
| Instituciones: | 1Universidad del País Vasco, Departamento de Filosofía, San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa. España |
| Año: | 2012 |
| Volumen: | 20 |
| Número: | 38 |
| Paginación: | 193-213 |
| País: | México |
| Idioma: | Español |
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Enfoque: | Analítico |
| Resumen en inglés | The fate of humanity in the biosphere dominates the background of our knowledge and existence in the twenty-first century. "Homo sapiens", as a conscious, self-reflexive and technical being, has produced a new kind of reality on our planet: the "noosphere". The noosphere was described collectively by Vladimir I. Vernadsky, Pierre Teilhar de Chardin and Edouard Le Roy in the 1920s as a scientific approach connected to philosophy and antropology. The noosphere is a product of the biosphere as transformed by human knowledge and action. The interface between the biosphere and the noosphere is the main effort to tackle the global spheres for sustainability, as proposed by Martin O'Connor. By approaching this interface we may unsderstand that we live in the Anthropocene, a new geological epoch or era in earth history. Although globlal-scale human influence on the environment has been recognized since 1800s, the term Anthropocene has recently become widely udes in the global change research community, especially in the interdisciplinary Earth System Science. This research community is an expression of the noosphere sekking global sustainability |
| Disciplinas: | Filosofía |
| Palabras clave: | Doctrinas y corrientes filosóficas, Filosofía de la ciencia, Gnoseología, Biósfera, Noosfera, Ciencias sociales, Ciencias de la naturaleza, Conocimiento, Epistemología, Teoría del conocimiento |
| Solicitud del documento | |
