| Revue: | Ludus vitalis |
| Base de datos: | CLASE |
| Número de sistema: | 000451284 |
| ISSN: | 1133-5165 |
| Autores: | Silenzi, María Inés1 |
| Instituciones: | 1Universidad Nacional del Sur, Departamento de Humanidades, Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires. Argentina |
| Año: | 2015 |
| Volumen: | 23 |
| Número: | 43 |
| Paginación: | 277-288 |
| País: | México |
| Idioma: | Español |
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Enfoque: | Analítico, crítico |
| Resumen en inglés | Whereas once the conflict within cognitive science was between connectionism and cognitive approach, today “the struggle of fashion” is from the classical and “postcognitivist” approaches to cognition. These “new” approaches to cognitive science, to which we restrict ourselves in this work, agree in rejecting, totally or partially, the classical approach, and call for the necessity to pay attention to aspects that the classical approach has not sufficiently addressed. In this paper we review critically, with the support in the literature, the various labels that refer to what we call postcognitivist approaches and some of its basic postulates through two possible readings, metaphysical and methodological. The objective of this work is not to describe each of the postcognitivists stances separately, but to provide an overview of the current situation within the cognitive sciences |
| Disciplinas: | Filosofía, Psicología |
| Palabras clave: | Gnoseología, Desarrollo psicológico, Ciencias cognitivas, Metafísica, Filosofía de la mente, Metodología, Producción de conocimientos |
| Texte intégral: | Texto completo (Ver HTML) |
