Revista: | International braz j urol |
Base de datos: | PERIÓDICA |
Número de sistema: | 000434671 |
ISSN: | 1677-5538 |
Autores: | Bandini, Marco1 Sekulovic, Sasha1 Stanojevic, Nikola1 Spiridonescu, Bogdan1 Pesic, Vladislav1 Sansalone, Salvatore3 Slavkovic, Milan1 Briganti, Alberto2 Salonia, Andrea2 Montorsi, Francesco2 Djinovic, Rados1 |
Instituciones: | 1BelMedic General Hospital, Center for Genito-Urinary Reconstructive Surgery, Belgrado. Serbia 2Universita Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milán, Lombardia. Italia 3Universita degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Sperimentale, Roma, Lazio. Italia |
Año: | 2019 |
Periodo: | Nov-Dic |
Volumen: | 45 |
Número: | 6 |
País: | Brasil |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
Enfoque: | Aplicado, descriptivo |
Resumen en inglés | Introduction: Pubic hypertrophy, defined as an abnormal and abundant round mass of fatty tissue located over the pubic symphysis, is frequently underestimated in patients with hypospadias. We examined the prevalence of this condition, as well as the outcomes associated with its surgical treatment. Material and methods: Within 266 hypospadias patients treated at our clinic, we assessed the prevalence of pubic hypertrophy, and we schematically described the surgical steps of pubic lipectomy. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) tested for predictors of pubic hypertrophy. Finally, separate MLRs tested for predictors of fistula and any complications after pubic lipectomy. Results: Of 266 hypospadias patients, 100 (37.6%) presented pubic hypertrophy and underwent pubic lipectomy. Patients with pubic hypertrophy more frequently had proximal hypospadias (44 vs. 7.8%), disorders of sex development (DSD) (10 vs. 0.6%), cryptorchidism (12 vs. 2.4%), and moderate (30°-60°) or severe (>60°) penile curvature (33 vs. 4.2%). In MLR, the location of urethral meatus (proximal, Odds ratio [OR]: 10.1, p<0.001) was the only significant predictor of pubic hypertrophy. Finally, pubic lipectomy was not associated with increased risk of fistula (OR: 1.12, p=0.7) or any complications (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.64-2.88, p=0.4) after multivariable adjustment. Conclusions: One out of three hypospadias patients, referred to our center, presented pubic hypertrophy and received pubic lipectomy. This rate was higher in patients with proximal hypospadias suggesting a correlation between pubic hypertrophy and severity of hypospadias. Noteworthy, pubic lipectomy was not associated with increased risk of fistula or any complications |
Disciplinas: | Medicina |
Palabras clave: | Urología, Cirugía, Pediatría, Hipospadias, Hipertrofia púbica, Lipectomía, Cirugía reconstructiva |
Keyword: | Urology, Surgery, Pediatrics, Pubic hypertrophy, Hypospadias, Lipectomy, Reconstructive surgery |
Texto completo: | Texto completo (Ver HTML) Texto completo (Ver PDF) |