Revista: | International braz j urol |
Base de datos: | PERIÓDICA |
Número de sistema: | 000434676 |
ISSN: | 1677-5538 |
Autores: | Lira, Gislano Heverton Soares de1 Fornari, Alexandre2 Cardoso, Luiz Felipe2 Aranchipe, Magda2 Kretiska, Carmem2 Rhoden, Ernani Luis1 |
Instituciones: | 1Universidade Federal de Ciencias da Saude de Porto Alegre, Departamento de Urologia, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul. Brasil 2Santa Casa de Misericordia de Porto Alegre, Unidade de Disfuncao Miccional, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul. Brasil |
Año: | 2019 |
Periodo: | Nov-Dic |
Volumen: | 45 |
Número: | 6 |
País: | Brasil |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
Enfoque: | Aplicado, descriptivo |
Resumen en inglés | Aims: Radical prostatectomy (RP) can result in urinary incontinence (UI) and erectile dysfunction (ED), which negatively impact quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a perioperative pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) program versus usual care on early recovery of urinary continence and erectile function after RP. Materials and Methods: Of 59 eligible men, 31 were randomly allocated into 2 groups: Group 1 (Control, N=15) received usual post-RP care; and Group 2 (Physical therapy, N=16) received two pre-RP physical therapist-guided PFMT sessions, including exercises and electromyographic biofeedback, and verbal and written instructions to continue PFMT until RP, which was then resumed after urethral catheter removal. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire were used to evaluate UI and ED, respectively. Results: Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Three months after RP, the UI rate was 72.7% and 70.0% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P >0.05). The severity and frequency of UI and its impact on QoL were evaluated by the ICIQ-Short Form, with scores of 6.9±6.26 in Group 1 and 7.0±5.12 in Group 2 (P >0.05). The IIEF-5 scores were similar in Groups 1 and 2 (5.73±7.43 vs. 6.70±6.68, respectively) (P >0.05). Conclusion: Our pre-RP protocol of two physical therapist-assisted sessions of PFMT plus instructions did not significantly improve urinary continence or erectile function at 3 months after RP |
Disciplinas: | Medicina |
Palabras clave: | Urología, Oncología, Próstata, Neoplasias, Resección quirúrgica, Incontinencia urinaria, Disfunción eréctil, Terapia física, Piso pélvico, Calidad de vida |
Keyword: | Urology, Oncology, Prostate, Neoplasms, Surgical resection, Urinary incontinence, Erectile dysfunction, Physical therapy, Pelvic floor, Quality of Life |
Texto completo: | Texto completo (Ver HTML) Texto completo (Ver PDF) |