| Revue: | International braz j urol |
| Base de datos: | PERIÓDICA |
| Número de sistema: | 000296932 |
| ISSN: | 1677-5538 |
| Autores: | Billis, Athanase1 Magna, Luis A Watanabe, Isabela C Costa, Matheus V Telles, Gilliatt H Ferreira, Ubirajara |
| Instituciones: | 1Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Escola de Medicina, Campinas, Sao Paulo. Brasil |
| Año: | 2006 |
| Periodo: | Mar-Abr |
| Volumen: | 32 |
| Número: | 2 |
| Paginación: | 165-171 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Enfoque: | Caso clínico, analítico |
| Resumen en inglés | PURPOSE: A recent study has found that PSA recurrence rate for clinical T1c tumors is similar to T2 tumors, indicating a need for further refinement of clinical staging system. To test this finding we compared clinicopathologic characteristics and the time to PSA progression following radical retropubic prostatectomy of patients with clinical stage T1c tumors to those with stage T2, T2a or T2b tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a total of 186 consecutive patients submitted to prostatectomy, 33.52% had clinical stage T1c tumors, 45.45% stage T2a tumors and 21.02% stage T2b tumors. The variables studied were age, preoperative PSA, prostate weight, Gleason score, tumor extent, positive surgical margins, extraprostatic extension (pT3a), seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b), and time to PSA progression. Tumor extent was evaluated by a point-count method. RESULTS: Patients with clinical stage T1c were younger and had the lowest mean preoperative PSA. In the surgical specimen, they had higher frequency of Gleason score < 7 and more organ confined cancer. In 40.54% of the patients with clinical stage T2b tumors, there was extraprostatic extension (pT3a). During the study period, 54 patients (30.68%) developed a biochemical progression. Kaplan-Meier product-limit analysis revealed no significant difference in the time to PSA progression between men with clinical stage T1c versus clinical stage T2 (p = 0.7959), T2a (p = 0.6060) or T2b (p = 0.2941) as well as between men with clinical stage T2a versus stage T2b (p = 0.0994). CONCLUSION: Clinicopathological features are not similar considering clinical stage T1c versus clinical stages T2, T2a or T2b |
| Disciplinas: | Medicina |
| Palabras clave: | Cirugía, Oncología, Neoplasias, Próstata, Clasificación, Patología, Antígeno prostático específico |
| Keyword: | Medicine, Oncology, Surgery, Neoplasms, Prostate, Classification, Pathology, Prostate specific antigen |
| Texte intégral: | Texto completo (Ver HTML) |
