| Revue: | Computación y sistemas |
| Base de datos: | PERIÓDICA |
| Número de sistema: | 000388902 |
| ISSN: | 1405-5546 |
| Autores: | Vallespir, Diego1 Moreno, Silvana1 Bogado, Carmen1 Herbert, Juliana |
| Instituciones: | 1Universidad de la República, Escuela de Ingeniería, Montevideo. Uruguay |
| Año: | 2015 |
| Periodo: | Jul-Sep |
| Volumen: | 19 |
| Número: | 3 |
| Paginación: | 563-576 |
| País: | México |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Enfoque: | Experimental, aplicado |
| Resumen en inglés | This article presents a controlled experiment that compares the behavior of the testing techniques Statement Coverage and All Uses. The design of this experiment is typical for a factor with two alternatives. A total of 14 subjects carry out tests on a single program. The results indicate that there is enough statistical evidence to state that the cost of executing All Uses is higher than that of executing Statement Coverage - a result that we expected to find. However, no statistical differences were found as regards the effectiveness of the techniques |
| Disciplinas: | Ciencias de la computación |
| Palabras clave: | Programación, Ingeniería de software, Técnicas de prueba, Control de calidad |
| Keyword: | Computer science, Programming, Software engineering, Test techniques, Quality control |
| Texte intégral: | Texto completo (Ver HTML) |
