| Revista: | BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
| Base de datos: | CLASE |
| Número de sistema: | 000337216 |
| ISSN: | 1807-7692 |
| Autores: | Villas, Marcos Vianna1 Macedo-Soares, T. Diana L. van Aduard de2 Russo, Giuseppe Maria2 |
| Instituciones: | 1Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro. Brasil 2Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Administracao e Gerencia, Rio de Janeiro. Brasil |
| Año: | 2008 |
| Periodo: | Abr-Jun |
| Volumen: | 5 |
| Número: | 2 |
| Paginación: | 139-159 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Enfoque: | Analítico |
| Resumen en inglés | This article proposes a three-stage method, with the use of multiple rankings as a starting point in the first stage to help carry out bibliographical research in a more effective and systematic fashion. The relevance of this method is made evident by way of a pioneer empirical investigation on the use and importance of scientific journal rankings as perceived by Brazilian professors in the practice of bibliographical research in the field of Business Administration. The results suggest that, although there is an awareness of the importance of ranking as a criterion for bibliographical research, with a view to identifying the state of the art and relevant research gaps, ranking is in fact hardly used on a regular basis. It is believed that the proposed method can help overcome this problem and contribute to more effective literature reviews and research |
| Disciplinas: | Bibliotecología y ciencia de la información |
| Palabras clave: | Análisis y sistematización de la información, Metodología de investigación, Investigación bibliográfica, Rankings, Factor de impacto, Administración de empresas |
| Texto completo: | Texto completo (Ver PDF) |
