| Journal: | Suma psicológica |
| Database: | |
| System number: | 000535402 |
| ISSN: | 0121-4381 |
| Authors: | Bustos Benítez, Paola Rocío1 Casallas, Olga Lucía Valencia1 |
| Institutions: | 1Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá. Colombia |
| Year: | 2019 |
| Season: | Ene-Jun |
| Volumen: | 26 |
| Number: | 1 |
| Pages: | 9-18 |
| Country: | Colombia |
| Language: | Español |
| Spanish abstract | El testimonio infantil en delitos sexuales ha sido un tema investigado. Esta investigación tiene como objetivo, analizar las preguntas del interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio, realizadas a niños(as) cuando rinden testimonio presumiéndose víctimas de delitos sexuales, bajo un estudio cualitativo con un diseño narrativo. Las unidades de análisis fueron las preguntas que hicieron la Fiscalía, Defensa, ministerio público y el juez en interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio a niños(as) como víctimas en audiencias de juicio oral. Se contabilizaron 1126 preguntas, clasificadas en dos categorías orientadoras: tipos de preguntas y elementos de apoyo. Respecto a la primera, se generaron los siguientes códigos: preguntas frecuentes y necesarias, de hechos específicos, prohibidas e inadecuadas, aclaratorias del juez, preguntas de opinión del niño(a) y objetadas; la segunda categoría se codificó en los medios electrónicos, los juegos, dibujos anatómicos, láminas y videos. Los datos se analizaron con el software ATLAS.ti 7.5.4. La investigación demuestra que los actores judiciales deben considerar la forma en que hacen las preguntas para cumplir con los mínimos estándares legales, además de preservar el bienestar integral de los niños, niñas y adolescentes (NNA), por lo que se sugiere fomentar la formación en quienes interrogan. |
| English abstract | The testimony of children in sexual crimes has been a subject investigated, but its study is not frequent when children are called as witnesses. The objective of this investigation was to analyze the interrogation and cross-examination questions made to children when they testify presuming victims of sexual crimes. It is a qualitative study, under a Narrative Design. The questions were obtained from eight videos of children giving testimony in oral hearing. The units of analysis were the questions asked by the Office of the Prosecutor, Defense, Public Pros ecutor and the Judge in the practice of the cross-examination and cross-examination. There were 1126 questions, classified into two guiding categories: types of questions and support elements. The data was analyzed with Atlas Ti software. Regarding the types of questions, the following codes were generated: Frequent and necessary questions, questions of specific facts, forbidden and inadequate questions, clarifying questions of the Judge, questions of opinion of the child and questions objected. And regarding the support elements, electronic media, games, anatomical drawings, pictures and videos. The investigation shows that judicial actors must not only consider the way in which they ask questions, in order to comply with the minimum legal standards, but that the children be considered as a psychological subject, whose integral welfare should be preserved, so it is suggested to encourage training in those who question. |
| Keyword: | Testimonio infantil, Interrogatorio, Abuso sexual infantil, Toma de decisiones, Judiciales |
| Keyword: | Child testimony, Interrogation, Child sexual abuse, Judicial decision making |
| Full text: | Texto completo (Ver HTML) Texto completo (Ver PDF) |
