| Journal: | RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo |
| Database: | CLASE |
| System number: | 000497986 |
| ISSN: | 2007-7467 |
| Authors: | Condori Nina, Mario1 |
| Institutions: | 1Fundación Universidad del Sur, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas. México |
| Year: | 2020 |
| Season: | Ene-Jun |
| Volumen: | 10 |
| Number: | 20 |
| Country: | México |
| Language: | Español |
| Document type: | Artículo |
| Approach: | Analítico, descriptivo |
| Spanish abstract | El objetivo de este trabajo fue proponer nuevas definiciones de términos epistémicos que son utilizados en el ámbito universitario y particularmente en ciencias socioculturales: gnoseología, epistemología y teoría del conocimiento, por un lado, y por el otro, los términos de explicación y comprensión. Para ello, estos conceptos pasaron por una exposición descriptiva para posteriormente ser tratados psicopedagógica y sociocríticamente, lo cual permitió conocer los pormenores intrínsecos que tienen cada uno ellos; este proceso garantizó una base teórica que permitió y fundamentó la propuesta de nuevas concepciones de los cinco términos en cuestión. Aparte del método de trabajo de campo de investigación, se utilizó el análisis teórico discriminante, el método descriptivo, el inductivo, el análisis-síntesis y de posición, el de la elevación de lo abstracto a lo concreto y lo histórico-lógico; también se recurrió al paradigma sociocrítico, al método propositivo y, particularmente, al método de la filofización de los hechos |
| English abstract | The objective of this work was to propose new definitions of epistemic terms that are used in the university environment and particularly in sociocultural sciences: epistemology, epistemology and theory of knowledge, on the one hand, and on the other, the terms of explanation and understanding. To do this, these concepts went through a descriptive exposition to later be treated psychopedagogically and sociocritically, which allowed knowing the intrinsic details that each one has; This process guaranteed a theoretical base that allowed and supported the proposal of new conceptions of the five terms in question. Apart from the research field work method, the discriminant theoretical analysis, the descriptive method, the inductive method, the analysis-synthesis and position, the elevation of the abstract to the concrete and the historical-logical were used; The socio-critical paradigm, the propositional method and, particularly, the method of the philosophization of events were also used. Among the results, first, it was possible to meet the objective of formulating new conceptual propositions for the aforementioned epistemic and social terms; second, it was detected that each of the reviewed authors has a different conceptual position regarding a single universal term, which leads to confusion; third, the three epistemes of epistemology, epistemology, and the theory of knowledge are synonymous, but epistemology differs from the other two because it is the only one that implies a treatment of the method; and fourth, regarding the social terms of explanation and understanding, both can contribute either separately or jointly to the physical, natural and social sciences, but the latter in some way differs from the former because it is more profound in its action in relationship with all kinds of facts: although it allows us to see objective questions, it is mainly useful for intersubjective and transcendental issues of all kinds of material and human facts |
| Portuguese abstract | Entre os resultados, primeiro, foi possível cumprir o objetivo de formular novas proposições conceituais para os termos epistêmicos e sociais acima mencionados; segundo, foi detectado que cada um dos autores revisados tem uma posição conceitual diferente em relação a um único termo universal, o que leva à confusão; terceiro, os três epistemólogos da epistemologia, epistemologia e teoria do conhecimento são sinônimos, mas a epistemologia difere das outras duas porque é a única que implica um tratamento do método; e quarto, com relação aos termos sociais de explicação e compreensão, ambos podem contribuir de forma separada ou conjunta para as ciências físicas, naturais e sociais, mas a última de alguma forma difere da primeira porque é mais profunda em sua ação em relacionamento com todos os tipos de fatos: embora nos permita ver perguntas objetivas, é útil principalmente para questões intersubjetivas e transcendentais de todos os tipos de fatos materiais e humanos |
| Disciplines: | Educación |
| Keyword: | Historia y filosofía de la educación, Comprensión, Epistemología, Explicación, Gnoseología, Psicopedagogía, Teoría del conocimiento |
| Keyword: | Education, History and philosophy of education, Understanding, Epistemology, Explanation, Gnoseology, Psycho-pedagogy, Theory of knowledge |
| Full text: | Texto completo (Ver HTML) Texto completo (Ver PDF) |
