| Journal: | La Calera |
| Database: | PERIÓDICA |
| System number: | 000447599 |
| ISSN: | 1998-7846 |
| Authors: | Rimbaud Giambruno, Enrique1 Mayorga Escobar, Maryuri Inés1 Guerrero Rojas, Luis Miguel1 López Badilla, Ana Cristina1 Vázquez Díaz, Marcela Alejandra1 |
| Institutions: | 1Universidad de Ciencias Comerciales, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Managua. Nicaragua |
| Year: | 2018 |
| Season: | Nov |
| Volumen: | 18 |
| Number: | 31 |
| Pages: | 95-97 |
| Country: | Nicaragua |
| Language: | Español |
| Document type: | Nota breve o noticia |
| Approach: | Experimental |
| Spanish abstract | Frente a desavenencias planteadas entre el diagnóstico clínico y laboratorial, se decide hacer un estudio comparativo entre el estudio diagnóstico de muestras de sangre central y periférica, para comparar resultados. Se muestrearon 100 vacas de diez fi ncas diferentes (10 vacas de cada fi nca), en la localidad de Pancasan, Matagalpa, Nicaragua, extrayendo de cada una, muestras de sangre central (vena yugular) y periférica (vena auricular). Todas las muestras fueron procesadas mediante frotis delgado, frotis de gota gruesa y visualización del capilar (Técnica de Woo), tiñéndolas tanto con los colorantes de Diff Quick, como con Giemsa. Los análisis de sangre central o periférica tienen errores muy grandes, mayores al 20%, como para confi ar plenamente en solo uno de ellos en el resultado de estudios sobre hemoparásitos. La sangre periférica solamente es más efi caz en el diagnóstico en un 2.79%, lo que no es signifi cativo (p < 0.1). Se recomienda realización de ambos análisis simultáneos (sangre central y periférica) para futuros diagnósticos de hemoparásitos en el laboratorio |
| English abstract | Faced with disagreements between the clinical and laboratory diagnosis, it was decided to make a comparative study between the diagnostic study of central and peripheral blood samples, to compare results. 100 cows were sampled from ten diff erent farms (10 cows from each farm) in the town of Pancasan, Matagalpa, Nicaragua, extracting from each one samples of central blood (jugular vein) and peripheral blood (auricular vein). All the samples were processed by means of a thin smear, thick smear and capillary visualization (Woo technique), dyeing them both with the Diff Quick dyes and with Giemsa. The central or peripheral blood tests have very large errors, greater than 20%, as to fully rely on only one of them in the results of studies on hemoparasites. Peripheral blood is only more eff ective in diagnosis at 2.79%, which is not signifi cant (P <0.1). It is recommended to carry out both simultaneous analyzes (central and peripheral blood) for future diagnoses of haemoparasites in the laboratory |
| Disciplines: | Medicina veterinaria y zootecnia |
| Keyword: | Bovinos, Medicina veterinaria, Frotis de sangre, Diagnóstico, Hemoparásitos |
| Keyword: | Bovines, Veterinary medicine, Blood smear, Diagnosis, Hemoparasites |
| Full text: | Texto completo (Ver PDF) Texto completo (Ver HTML) |
