Validation and comparison of simple noninvasive models for the prediction of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C



Document title: Validation and comparison of simple noninvasive models for the prediction of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C
Journal: Annals of hepatology
Database: PERIÓDICA
System number: 000417638
ISSN: 1665-2681
Authors: 1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
Institutions: 1Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Divisao de Gastroenterologia, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina. Brasil
2Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Patologia, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina. Brasil
Year:
Season: Nov-Dic
Volumen: 11
Number: 6
Pages: 855-861
Country: México
Language: Inglés
Document type: Estadística o encuesta
Approach: Analítico
English abstract Although it is standard procedure in the evaluation of liver diseases, biopsy is an invasive method subject to sampling error and intra or inter-observer variability. Thus, surrogate markers of liver fibrosis have been proposed, with variable availability and accuracy. Aim. Validate and compare the performance of APRI and FIB-4 as predictors of liver fibrosis in HCV patients. Material and methods. Crosssectional study including patients with HCV-RNA (+) who underwent liver biopsy. Significant fibrosis was defined as METAVIR stage ≥ 2. The diagnostic performance of the models in predicting significant fibrosis were evaluated and compared by ROC curves. Results. The study included 119 patients, mean age 43.7 ± 10.6 years and 62% males. Significant fibrosis was identified in 41 patients. The AUROCs observed were: APRI = 0.793 ± 0.047, FIB-4 = 0.811 ± 0.045 and AST/ALT = 0.661 ± 0.055 (P = 0.054 for APRI vs. AST/ALT, and P = 0.014 for FIB-4 vs. AST/ALT). Considering classic cutoffs, the PPV and NPV for APRI and FIB-4 were, respectively, 77% and 92% and 83% and 81%. Thirteen (19%) patients were misdiagnosed by APRI and 16 (18%) by FIB-4. By restricting the indication of liver biopsy to patients with intermediate values, it could have been correctly avoided in 47% and 63% of the patients with APRI and FIB-4, respectively. Conclusion. The models APRI and FIB-4 were superior to AST/ALT ratio in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis in chronic HCV infection. Even though the overall performance of APRI and FIB-4 was similar, a higher proportion of patients may be correctly classified by FIB-4
Disciplines: Medicina
Keyword: Gastroenterología,
Diagnóstico,
Cirrosis hepática,
Biomarcadores,
Hepatitis C,
Hepatitis crónica,
Modelos predictivos,
Variables,
Laboratorio
Keyword: Gastroenterology,
Diagnosis,
Liver cirrhosis,
Biomarkers,
Hepatitis C,
Chronic hepatitis,
Predictive models,
Variables,
Laboratory
Full text: Texto completo (Ver HTML)