| Revista: | Tropical and subtropical agroecosystems |
| Base de datos: | PERIÓDICA |
| Número de sistema: | 000372730 |
| ISSN: | 1870-0462 |
| Autores: | Mutsotso, Beneah1 Muya, Edward2 Roimen, Henry |
| Instituciones: | 1University of Nairobi, Department of Sociology and Social Work, Ruiru. Kenia 2Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Nairobi. Kenia |
| Año: | 2011 |
| Volumen: | 13 |
| Número: | 1 |
| País: | México |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Enfoque: | Descriptivo |
| Resumen en inglés | In Kenya the belowground biodiversity project was implemented in Embu and Taita which are biodiversity hotspots. The objective of the BGBD project was to enhance awareness, knowledge and understanding of below ground biological diversity important for sustainable agricultural production by demonstration of methods for conservation and sustainable man power. The objective of the paper is to present and analyze farmers' knowledge, attitudes and practices at different timelines of the project, as well as identify factors limiting adoption of the best bet technologies of enhanced biodiversity conservation and increased agricultural production. In early 1960's when natural forest was cleared for farming activities no farm inputs were introduced in food crops until after 10 years. Ever since, to the present similar farm imputs and crops have been propagated continuously leading to declined food production hence the BGBD project interventions. A triangulation of methods, both quantitative and qualitative participatory approaches were used to obtain data from farmers in both benchmark sites. The results showed that most farmers were more aware of the diversity of organisms in the soil at the end of the project compared to the beginning. As much as the best bet technologies were identified, their adoption was constrained by the unavailability of the technologies in local agro shops. This forced farmers to continue using the farming techniques that had deleterious effects on the soil. Hence farmers adopt what works, but which must be locally available. In this, cost considerations did not matter, but simply inaccessibility |
| Disciplinas: | Sociología |
| Palabras clave: | Organización social, Sociología del trabajo, Campesinos, Conocimiento, Embu, Taita, Proyectos, Tecnología, Kenia |
| Keyword: | Sociology, Social organization, Sociology of labor, Farmers, Knowledge, Embu, Taita, Projects, Technology, Kenya |
| Texto completo: | Texto completo (Ver HTML) |
