Concurrent validity of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory versus the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria among patients with Parkinson’s disease



Título del documento: Concurrent validity of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory versus the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria among patients with Parkinson’s disease
Revista: Revista ecuatoriana de neurología
Base de datos: PERIÓDICA
Número de sistema: 000316043
ISSN: 1019-8113
Autores: 1
2
Instituciones: 1Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín, Servicio de Neurología, Quito, Pichincha. Ecuador
2Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Facultad de Medicina, Quito, Pichincha. Ecuador
Año:
Volumen: 16
Número: 3
Paginación: 174-180
País: Ecuador
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de documento: Artículo
Enfoque: Experimental, aplicado
Resumen en inglés Objective: To examine the concurrent validity of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory for quantifying depression in patients with Parkinson’s disease, using the ICD-10 Diagnostic Criteria as the gold standard, and to determine if the somatization items considered are pertinent. Methods: The study involved one hundred and forty consecutive PD patients –102 men and 38 women– with a mean age of 68.7 years and mean disease duration of 6.7 years. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios were obtained with a 95% CI. ROC Curves (AUC) were also performed. Results: Based on ROC measurement of discriminative ability, our results suggest that both scales were poor at recognizing mild depression, somewhat better at recognizing moderate depression and adequate for distinguishing severe depression, though with poor specificity. Comparisons of HDRS-21, HDRS-12, BDI-21 and BDI-16 to determine concurrent validity all gave similar results for each depression level and no important differences between the complete scales (all 21 items) and abbreviated forms (without somatic items) were noted. Conclusions: We conclude that both scales possess similar psychometric properties, but our results cannot be compared with those of other studies that used DSM-IV criteria as their gold standard. These observations led to the following conclusions: (1) the evaluation scales and criteria that comprise them were not designed for PD; (2) the somatic items observed in our patients were a product of PD; and (3) as the severity of the illness increased, so did the number of items that were confused as elements of depression
Disciplinas: Medicina
Palabras clave: Diagnóstico,
Neurología,
Psiquiatría,
Enfermedad de Parkinson,
Depresión,
Evaluación neuropsicológica,
Criterios diagnósticos,
Somatización
Keyword: Medicine,
Diagnosis,
Neurology,
Psychiatry,
Parkinson disease,
Depression,
Neuropsychological evaluation,
Diagnostic criteria,
Somatization
Texto completo: Texto completo (Ver PDF)
Redisplay

Deacuerdo al idioma de su navegador le sugerimos cambiar el idioma de la página a English