| Revista: | Ludus vitalis |
| Base de datos: | CLASE |
| Número de sistema: | 000415903 |
| ISSN: | 1133-5165 |
| Autores: | Cíntora Gómez, Armando1 |
| Instituciones: | 1Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Departamento de Filosofía, Iztapalapa, Distrito Federal. México |
| Año: | 2014 |
| Volumen: | 22 |
| Número: | 42 |
| Paginación: | 103-113 |
| País: | México |
| Idioma: | Español |
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Enfoque: | Analítico, descriptivo |
| Resumen en inglés | Popper argues in the Logic of Scientific Discovery (published in 1934 in German) against both an externalist and an inter nalist epistemic justification for observational statements; Popper then opts in t he LSD for a position that substitutes the justification of the basic statemen ts of science with their criti - cism; and he stops a regress of criticisms with som e conventional decisions. Later, in the Open Society (1945) he argues for a critical rationalism, one t hat requires some argumentatively unjustified and unjus tifiable presuppositions, i.e., it requires some dogmas. The late Popper (cir ca 1983), seems inclined towards a pancritical rationalism, a position that leads, however, to a logical paradox, which can only be evaded if some presuppos itions are to be accepted as not criticizable. Thus, the Popperian requires e ither some unjustifiable or some uncriticizable presuppositions. These dogmatic presuppositions should be believed passively and judgment about their trut h value should be sus - pended. This is the Popperian’s Pyrrhonian attitude |
| Disciplinas: | Filosofía |
| Palabras clave: | Filosofía de la ciencia, Doctrinas y corrientes filosóficas, Racionalismo crítico, Racionalismo, Popper, Karl, Dogmatismo, Justificación, Epistemología, Irracionalismo |
| Texto completo: | Texto completo (Ver PDF) |
