| Revista: | Dados |
| Base de datos: | CLASE |
| Número de sistema: | 000321854 |
| ISSN: | 0011-5258 |
| Autores: | Carvalho, Maria Izabel Valladao de1 |
| Instituciones: | 1Universidade de Brasilia, Instituto de Relacoes Internacionais, Brasilia, Distrito Federal. Brasil |
| Año: | 2010 |
| Volumen: | 53 |
| Número: | 2 |
| Paginación: | 405-455 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Idioma: | Portugués |
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Enfoque: | Analítico |
| Resumen en inglés | This article analyzes Brazil's performance during the agricultural negotiations in the Doha Round, considering the implications of domestic backing for the country's credibility vis-à-vis the G-20 and the coalition's contribution to increasing Brazil's bargaining power in relation to pressure from the United States and the European Union. The study investigated the positions of agribusiness interest groups, G-20, United States, and European Union in distinct negotiating phases. The theoretical framework used here was the two-level game model. The following observations emerged: domestic backing evolved over the course of the Doha Round; the G-20 helped increase Brazil's bargaining power; and the intensification of disagreements between agribusiness and the negotiations and clashes between agricultural exporting countries and net food importers inside the G-20 eroded Brazil's capacity to act via the coalition and shifted it away from the group in 2008. The study explores the consequences of Brazil's decision for the partnership between Brazil and India |
| Disciplinas: | Relaciones internacionales |
| Palabras clave: | Relaciones económicas internacionales, Brasil, Grupo de los 20 (G-20), Ronda de Doha, Agronegocios, Juego de dos niveles |
| Texto completo: | Texto completo (Ver HTML) |
