| Revista: | BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
| Base de datos: | CLASE |
| Número de sistema: | 000337214 |
| ISSN: | 1807-7692 |
| Autores: | Soares-Junior, Jair1 Quintella, Rogerio H1 |
| Instituciones: | 1Universidade Federal da Bahia, Escola de Administracao, Salvador, Bahia. Brasil |
| Año: | 2008 |
| Periodo: | Abr-Jun |
| Volumen: | 5 |
| Número: | 2 |
| Paginación: | 104-124 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Enfoque: | Analítico, crítico |
| Resumen en inglés | This paper presents the result of a comprehensive analysis of the main forms of development measurement. Recognizing the level of complexity that the subject involves, aspects related to interpretations and dominant ideologies in development/growth concepts are shown initially. The second part of this work constitutes a critical analysis of forty-three of the most well-known national and international indicators used to measure this phenomenon. It is imagined that this analysis can show the state of the art for constructing development indicators. The development process covers a complexity of relationships. Its analysis, therefore, cannot be restricted only to the economic dimension because, as a rule, the question is presented both in the media and a considerable part of specialized literature. Emphasis on this dimension has historic origins, which have already shown the fragility of this approach |
| Disciplinas: | Sociología, Economía, Historia |
| Palabras clave: | Desarrollo económico, Desarrollo social, Desarrollo sustentable, Indicadores de desarrollo, Desarrollo, Medición, Bienestar, Conceptos, Teoría del desarrollo |
| Texto completo: | Texto completo (Ver PDF) |
