Voiding symptoms obtained by open versus directed anamnesis as predictors of voiding dysfunction in women



Título del documento: Voiding symptoms obtained by open versus directed anamnesis as predictors of voiding dysfunction in women
Revista: International braz j urol
Base de datos: PERIÓDICA
Número de sistema: 000434728
ISSN: 1677-5538
Autors: 1
1
1
1
2
3
Institucions: 1Universidad de Chile, Hospital Clínico, Santiago de Chile. Chile
2Centro Urológico Profesor Bengió, Córdoba. Argentina
3Instituto Modelo de Cardiología SRL, Departamento de Urología, Córdoba. Argentina
Any:
Període: Jul-Ago
Volum: 45
Número: 4
País: Brasil
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de documento: Artículo
Enfoque: Analítico, descriptivo
Resumen en inglés Objectives To determine the differences between voiding symptoms obtained by open anamnesis (VS-Open) versus voiding symptoms obtained by directed anamnesis (VS-Directed) to predict voiding dysfunction in women. Materials and Methods Retrospective study of women with prior anti-incontinence surgery evaluated during 5 years. In a standardized clinical history taking, each patient was asked to answer question number five of the UDI-6 questionnaire (“Do you experience any difficulty emptying your bladder?”). If the answer was positive, the following voiding symptoms spontaneously described by the patient were documented: slow urine stream, straining to void, intermittent stream and feeling of incomplete bladder emptying, which were considered VS-Open. If the answer to this question was negative or if the patient had not reported the four voiding symptoms, she was asked in a directed manner about the presence of each o Ninety-one women are analyzed. Eighteen patients presented voiding dysfunction (19.8%), There was a statistical association between voiding dysfunction and the presence of any VS-Open (p = 0.037) and straining to void obtained by open anamnesis (p = 0.013). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio, respectively, were 44.4% and 27.8%, 80.8% and 94.5%, 36.3% and 55.6%, 85.5% and 84.1%, 2.324 and 5.129, and 0.686 and 0.764. There was no statistical association between voiding dysfunction and VS-Directed. Conclusions VS-Open may predict better voiding dysfunction than VS-Directed in women
Disciplines Medicina
Paraules clau: Urología,
Mujeres,
Disfunción urinaria,
Vaciamiento,
Anámnesis
Keyword: Urology,
Women,
Urinary dysfunction,
Voiding,
Anamnesis
Text complet: Texto completo (Ver HTML) Texto completo (Ver PDF)