Revista: | Dados |
Base de datos: | CLASE |
Número de sistema: | 000281349 |
ISSN: | 0011-5258 |
Autors: | Lavinas, Lena1 Nicoll, Marcelo2 |
Institucions: | 1Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Economia, Rio de Janeiro. Brasil 2Escola Nacional de Ciencias Estatisticas, Rio de Janeiro. Brasil |
Any: | 2006 |
Volum: | 49 |
Número: | 1 |
Paginació: | 67-97 |
País: | Brasil |
Idioma: | Portugués |
Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
Enfoque: | Analítico, socioeconómico |
Resumen en inglés | The purpose of this article is to compare different family models according to the typology proposed by the IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, or National Census Bureau), to verify whether families headed by women really represent the most vulnerable or "at-risk" family arrangement. The latter is the commonsense notion that legitimizes the framework of feminization of poverty, in vogue in the last two decades and with considerable impact on the design of anti-poverty social policies. The current empirical study disaggregates the employment data (employment rate, mean wages, workweek) not only by gender (identifying differences between men and women), but also breaking down the data for women, comparing the situation of women heads-of-families versus wives. In terms of women's full participation in the work market, the effect of conjugality is even more harmful than motherhood (presence of children) |
Disciplines | Sociología |
Paraules clau: | Sociología de la familia, Sociología de la mujer, Brasil, Familias, Mujeres, Pobreza, Salarios, Empleo, Inequidad social, Estudios de género, Jefes de familia |
Text complet: | Texto completo (Ver HTML) |