Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations?



Título del documento: Why Not Eminently Maritime UN Peacekeeping Operations?
Revista: Contexto internacional
Base de datos: CLASE
Número de sistema: 000458209
ISSN: 0102-8529
Autors: 1
Institucions: 1Escola Superior de Guerra, Rio de Janeiro. Brasil
Any:
Període: May-Ago
Volum: 39
Número: 2
Paginació: 245-261
País: Brasil
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de documento: Artículo
Enfoque: Analítico, descriptivo
Resumen en inglés Although the UN Charter does not explicitly provide for Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs), they have become one of the UN’s most important means of preserving peace and international security. Some of the greatest threats to international peace and security do not occur on ‘UN Member States territory’, but at sea. The internationally significant and long-standing phenomenon of maritime piracy initially led to international action off the coast of Somalia, but other regions affected by criminal acts at sea (including the Straits of Malacca, the Gulf of Guinea and the Mediterranean Sea) are reinforcing the need for international action. In most of these situations, the UN has not acted directly, but called on multilateral or regional bodies to do so. Earlier experiences in PKOs at sea, in Cambodia, East Timor, Haiti, and most recently in Lebanon, undertaken by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), begin to provide a basis for building a naval PKO doctrine. This article argues that it is legitimate for the UN to undertake direct action when facing threats to maritime security, making use of an empirical example and suggests that new instances of criminal acts at sea, such as those in the Gulf of Guinea, may best be dealt with under a direct UN mandate
Disciplines Relaciones internacionales
Paraules clau: Política internacional,
Seguridad marítima,
Operaciones de paz,
Cooperación internacional,
Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU),
Piratería,
Defensa,
Ley del mar,
Derecho internacional,
Océanos,
Geopolítica
Text complet: Texto completo (Ver PDF)